BAD DOCTOR: COUPPIS, Orestes

 


So, I decided to start the Name & Shame the Bad Doctor series with Orestes Cuppis because he makes a very good display of how manipulation, discrimination, and some kind of perverse power game motivates some of our "doctors".

To put it into context, I don't speak medicalese ... I am in my 50s and I have always enjoyed reasonable good health. The only medication I have been familiar with has been the occasional sachet of lemsip, or some antibiotics before getting dental treatment. Since I started to practice Reiki, my most common remedies have been meditation, healthy eating, occasional fast, self-love ... And my autistic nature has added a healthy dislike for chemical products; their tastes and smells are repulsive.

So, I don't really know what doctors do other than what I have learnt from programmes like ER and Scrubs. I don't know what their specialisms are, and I have absolutely not a clue of their higherarchy or structure, Also, I'm not big on titles. I'd rather call someone John than Dr Something. Similarly, I don't want to be called by my first name by someone whom I cannot call by first name too. It's only fair. Most of these doctors are in fact kids. And their behaviour clearly shows prattish and spoilt demeanours.

My idea of what a doctor does is that they are supposed to heal us. So, if suddenly from healthy you turn ill, you might think that it is appropriate to go and see the doctors. If you have infections, you might think "oh yeah, my doctor should be able to help". If medication doesn't work, or has side effects, again, I'd think that the doctor is the correct person to seek.

Maybe I am using the wrong terminology, but I would term that as "monitoring a person's conditions". Is that really crazy? I don't think so. I believe it is part and parcel of a GPs role.



one day I was called by my GP surgery who wanted to give me an appointment for some mysterious reasons

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Examples of Gaslighting

Image
 I thought this is a good opportunity to show some of the signs of gaslighting that are apparent when reading consultants' letter being sent to the GP. The first couple of items are as expected. The consultant makes appropriate referrals. Hoowever, the rest of the letter is an exercise in manipulation and deception. Let's start with Diagnosis 3. The doctor was told of debilitating side effects of the medication prescribed. Yet, she ignored that and "advised to continue" . Certainly that is objectionable! When we look at Diagnosis 4 the doctor decided that " the patient believes " which is not worthy of referral. So, in a stroke of manipulation they write to the GP to alert them that their patient is being "crazy" and concludes the sentence with " GP to kindlhy consider referral " Again, manipulation and deception. Why the need to lie? Not only that, I have just researched my symptoms because I was asked the entrapment question " what
Read more

More real-life examples of abusive behaviour

Image
This letter is another example of how gaslighting occurs and how doctors share information deceptively between providers and departments. Apologies for the letter being so reducted. The first point to note is the multiple diagnoses and the plan.  The plan includes 4 different types of medication that are not needed. 2 out of these 4 had been discontinued for over a year. The doctor prescribed those meds in some kind of "revenge" for reporting side effect with the given medication. Interestingly, I reported side effect, however she decided to write in the email "prefers to avoid oral antibiotic".  I can only interpret that as a malicious comment intent on defamation of character. I reported side-effect. I do not have a problem with taking medication orally. Again, this was clearly an act of  victimisation for requesting different medication. During this appointment, the doctor also told me, under her breath, that I was obese. When I asked about it, she ignored me. Sh
Read more